Hunger Games getting out of hand!

[Bray]

So, wardens keep doing Hunger Games over and over again, can we please put this as classified, as rule breaking?

 

[Thstardust]

I would make a long list of why this is a really bad idea, but since i know it'll never be accepted, i will just put that i support javert/diwattsy on this...

 

[Ibram]

I agree it does get out of hand, but it is better than some options. Wardens choose to play hunger games because they might be out numbered by reds and cannot deal with rebellions all the time. Also, most reds want to play hunger games. IMO it's better than having rebelling reds every round.

 

[Thstardust]

I agree it does get out of hand, but it is better than some options. Wardens choose to play hunger games because they might be out numbered by reds and cannot deal with rebellions all the time. Also, most reds want to play hunger games. IMO it's better than having rebelling reds every round.

Also, it's a nice way for inexperienced wardens to learn to play. It seems to be the "newbie" wardens choice most of the time, and i think that we should keep in mind that new wardens is important

 

[Cactus]

I think we need to stop with hunger games, that movie was stupid too, book was too, Lel I'll stop, but people play it over and over and over and over and over....

 

[Highrize420]

I don't think we should. Maybe a rule not to do it more than twice in a row. Reds favor hunger games too much for it to be against the rules.

 

[Defalt]

We have bloodlust. And if we kill BLU, we get killed. So why not kill the guy who took the last helping of tater tots?

 

[Cactus]

We have bloodlust. And if we kill BLU, we get killed. So why not kill the guy who took the last helping of tater tots?

U w0t


Please take out hunger games, wardens just use it when they are lazy... Or maybe put a 2 round buffer?

 

[Highrize420]

U w0t


Please take out hunger games, wardens just use it when they are lazy... Or maybe put a 2 round buffer?

No

 

[Cactus]

No

Fine.

 

[dead]

I think he wasn't referring to just playing Hunger Games, but he meant doing it over and over.

 

[CaveJohnson]

I think it should only be used once a map.

Usually people who can't control the reds do this over and over.
Bit sad actually.

 

[Katze]

I think it should only be used once a map.

Usually people who can't control the reds do this over and over.
Bit sad actually.

It's not exactly simple to control a large number of reds when there are very few guards. When cell doors open and ~10 reds rush in opposite directions and/or at you, it's no simple feat to organise your team of 4 guards to chase them all down before they kill all of you.

Hunger Games is still used too often sometimes. Although it is a fun way to deal with unbalance, it can become overdone when the name of the game (literally), Jailbreak, is lost.

 

[Bray]

See, I've been saying to not do Hunger Games OVER AND OVER, its really irritating. I've left the server alot because of this one problem.

 

[Thstardust]

feel free to leave if you don't like the server rules

 

[Bray]

feel free to leave if you don't like the server rules

I love the server's rules I just don't like the fact that some wardens keep doing Hunger Games over and over again every round.

 

[Nachös]

Says the guy spamming binds saying "HUNGER GAMES OR MASS REBELLION" ^^^^

 

[Astra]

I like hunger games but 6 rounds in a row? Really? I think it's just a fad that everyone will get tired of eventually and it'll die down. Also you guys have good points with it being the "go-to activity" for new wardens and it is a good way to start learning. I just think it needs some sort of limit because it does get a bit ridiculous.

 

[Bray]

Says the guy spamming binds saying "HUNGER GAMES OR MASS REBELLION" ^^^^

I wasn't spamming. I was saying it at points, and it was 3 rounds, not 6. Or 10.

 

[dead]

I agree, if the servers add a limit (Perhaps somewhere around 2-4?) then people won't spam saying that Hunger Games is getting boring.