Ibram
Recognized Member
If it was then you are correct @ShadowOfEclipse there are no rules that say you can't restrict re-activating tauntsI was there. @Thstardust was the warden and stated this.
Last edited:
If it was then you are correct @ShadowOfEclipse there are no rules that say you can't restrict re-activating tauntsI was there. @Thstardust was the warden and stated this.
It wasn't a freekill. Star, as warden, stated that untaunting then taunting again was not afk frozen. Stating this did not impact or "throw out", per say, any rules therefore it was a valid command. Unless I am mistaken and there is a rule stating that taunting then untaunting is still afk frozen.Ok, let do some clearing up here, Star does have a point stating that Flamer wasn't AFK "frozen" however in the rules there isn't a specification on how the rules is meant to be implemented. Everyone has stated thier points, and I can't choose a side but I think we have to call the law maker here and set it forth. @Asu please clear this up for these people(sometimes Asu is busy and can't reply to this so @Madame pls(I don't know if madame replied to this already because of Ibram and his FUCKING PICTURE CHANGE) )So I say we leave it up to them but atm I see this as a freekill. If you would like to report star and DO NOT BE AFRAID OF REPORTING STAFF(in general) Feel free to do so.
However did he say it before killing Flamer? Because if he didn't then that would be considered freekilling as in stating a rule after killing someone and it would count as favortism.It wasn't a freekill. Star, as warden, stated that untaunting then taunting again was not afk frozen. Stating this did not impact or "throw out", per say, any rules therefore it was a valid command. Unless I am mistaken and there is a rule stating that taunting then untaunting is still afk frozen.
He did say it before he killed flamer. He said "Taunting then untaunting is not afk frozen" then flamer toggled the taunt off then back on.However did he say it before killing Flamer? Because if he didn't then that would be considered freekilling as in stating a rule after killing someone and it would count as favortism.
Maybe he dosen't have as quick reflexes trust me, I would have done same thing 'cause I process things said to me slow unless in school where im focused. BUT STILL LET WAIT FOR ASU OR MADAMEHe did say it before he killed flamer. He said "Taunting then untaunting is not afk frozen" then flamer toggled the taunt off then back on.
So what? That's like calling favoritism for playing box game if you have slow reflexes. Star gave a command, Flamer didn't follow said command, so he would be kos. Why specifically Asu or Madame? @Keywest or @Katze would also be able to clear this up.Maybe he dosen't have as quick reflexes trust me, I would have done same thing 'cause I process things said to me slow unless in school where im focused. BUT STILL LET WAIT FOR ASU OR MADAME
I know they could but I thought the creator of the rules would be the best to specify in this situation since Key already replied and I don't think it cleared the situation as you would think. Key and Quote are interpreters of the rules but the best proof is the creator.
I dont think @Katze has ever been on jailbreak, and @Asu is just the writer. You guys need to find out what it means.I know they could but I thought the creator of the rules would be the best to specify in this situation since Key already replied and I don't think it cleared the situation as you would think. Key and Quote are interpreters of the rules but the best proof is the creator.
Also the reflexes things wasn't my prime example it was a reasoning why this could have happened.
Are you suggesting in >1 years I don't know the server rulesI know they could but I thought the creator of the rules would be the best to specify in this situation since Key already replied and I don't think it cleared the situation as you would think. Key and Quote are interpreters of the rules but the best proof is the creator.
Also the reflexes things wasn't my prime example it was a reasoning why this could have happened.
At least you are honestAre you suggesting in >1 years I don't know the server rules
Because you're right
How?This is getting out of hand.
Nothing was getting out of hand, we just wanted to have a discussion and come to a unanimous decisionThis is getting out of hand.
meAre you suggesting in >1 years I don't know the server rules
Because you're right
I didn't say that but I said that I THOUGHT that Asu could say what it really means.Are you suggesting in >1 years I don't know the server rules
Because you're right
AFK Freeze / Freezing - All RED(s) must remain frozen.
It is considered AFK freezing as long as the follow criteria is met:
No switching of weapons
No positional movement (no moving up, down, left, right, forward or backward)
Not shooting or swinging melee
All taunts will puts your character into a frozen state (i.e Hi-5)
Crouching is always allowed.
Freelooking is always allowed.
It is considered AFK freezing as long as the follow criteria is met:So does this mean that i could teabag the yellow line and still be afk? That's gonna be nice against snipers. Does the "freelooking is always allowed" apply to something like "face your cells", as well? Or is it only when no direction is given?